1983 Mercury Lynx vs. 1965 Seat 600
To start off, 1983 Mercury Lynx is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Seat 600 would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Mercury Lynx is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Mercury Lynx weights approximately 379 kg more than 1965 Seat 600.
Because 1965 Seat 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Seat 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Mercury Lynx, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Mercury Lynx (121 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Seat 600. (47 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1983 Mercury Lynx will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Mercury Lynx | 1965 Seat 600 | |
| Make | Mercury | Seat |
| Model | Lynx | 600 |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1598 cc | 767 cc |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 121 Nm | 47 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 954 kg | 575 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 3300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1390 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2010 mm |
