1983 Mercury Lynx vs. 1966 Steyr 700C

To start off, 1983 Mercury Lynx is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Steyr 700C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Steyr 700C would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Mercury Lynx is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Mercury Lynx (83 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1966 Steyr 700C. (20 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Mercury Lynx should accelerate faster than 1966 Steyr 700C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Mercury Lynx weights approximately 410 kg more than 1966 Steyr 700C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1966 Steyr 700C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Steyr 700C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Mercury Lynx, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Mercury Lynx (122 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Steyr 700C. (40 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1983 Mercury Lynx will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Steyr 700C.

Compare all specifications: