1983 Mercury Lynx vs. 2010 Chevrolet Camaro

To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mercury Lynx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mercury Lynx would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Camaro (304 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 253 more horse power than 1983 Mercury Lynx. (51 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1983 Mercury Lynx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 647 kg more than 1983 Mercury Lynx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2010 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Mercury Lynx, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Chevrolet Camaro (370 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 259 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Mercury Lynx. (111 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2010 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Mercury Lynx.

Compare all specifications:

1983 Mercury Lynx 2010 Chevrolet Camaro
Make Mercury Chevrolet
Model Lynx Camaro
Year Released 1983 2010
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1998 cc 3600 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 51 HP 304 HP
Engine RPM 3600 RPM 6400 RPM
Torque 111 Nm 370 Nm
Torque RPM 2400 RPM 5200 RPM
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Vehicle Weight 1050 kg 1697 kg
Vehicle Length 4170 mm 4836 mm
Vehicle Width 1680 mm 1918 mm
Vehicle Height 1360 mm 1377 mm
Wheelbase Size 2400 mm 2852 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]