1983 Mercury Lynx vs. 2012 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2012 Toyota Matrix is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mercury Lynx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mercury Lynx would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Toyota Matrix (132 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1983 Mercury Lynx. (83 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1983 Mercury Lynx.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Toyota Matrix (173 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Mercury Lynx. (122 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2012 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Mercury Lynx.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Mercury Lynx | 2012 Toyota Matrix | |
| Make | Mercury | Toyota |
| Model | Lynx | Matrix |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 83 HP | 132 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 122 Nm | 173 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 4366 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1765 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1549 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2601 mm |
