1983 Mini MK IV vs. 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 1983 Mini MK IV is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 1490 kg more than 1983 Mini MK IV.
Because 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Mini MK IV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Mini MK IV | 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
| Make | Mini | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | MK IV | Silver Shadow |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 847 cc | 6230 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 2100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 5180 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 3040 mm |
