1983 Mini MK IV vs. 2012 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 Holden Epica is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mini MK IV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mini MK IV would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 114 more horse power than 1983 Mini MK IV. (34 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1983 Mini MK IV.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 259 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Mini MK IV. (61 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Mini MK IV.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Mini MK IV | 2012 Holden Epica | |
Make | Mini | Holden |
Model | MK IV | Epica |
Year Released | 1983 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 847 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 61 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2700 mm |