1983 Mini MK IV vs. 2012 Holden UTE
To start off, 2012 Holden UTE is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mini MK IV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mini MK IV would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden UTE (281 HP) has 247 more horse power than 1983 Mini MK IV. (34 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1983 Mini MK IV.
Because 2012 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Mini MK IV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden UTE (350 Nm) has 289 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Mini MK IV. (61 Nm). This means 2012 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Mini MK IV.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Mini MK IV | 2012 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Mini | Holden |
| Model | MK IV | UTE |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 847 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 281 HP |
| Torque | 61 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
