1983 Mini MK V vs. 1999 Renault Zo

To start off, 1999 Renault Zo is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mini MK V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mini MK V would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Renault Zo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Renault Zo (74 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1983 Mini MK V. (41 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Renault Zo should accelerate faster than 1983 Mini MK V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Renault Zo weights approximately 950 kg more than 1983 Mini MK V. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1999 Renault Zo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Renault Zo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Mini MK V, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Renault Zo (260 Nm) has 190 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Mini MK V. (70 Nm). This means 1999 Renault Zo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Mini MK V. 1999 Renault Zo has automatic transmission and 1983 Mini MK V has manual transmission. 1983 Mini MK V will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Renault Zo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: