1983 Mini MK V vs. 2005 Renault Clio
To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mini MK V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mini MK V would be higher. At 1,390 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Renault Clio (74 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1983 Mini MK V. (41 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1983 Mini MK V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Clio weights approximately 510 kg more than 1983 Mini MK V. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Renault Clio (105 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Mini MK V. (70 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2005 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Mini MK V.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Mini MK V | 2005 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mini | Renault |
Model | MK V | Clio |
Year Released | 1983 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 997 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 70 Nm | 105 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 625 kg | 1135 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2630 mm |