1983 Mini MK V vs. 2012 Kia Cee'd
To start off, 2012 Kia Cee'd is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mini MK V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mini MK V would be higher. At 1,582 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Kia Cee'd is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Kia Cee'd (114 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1983 Mini MK V. (41 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Kia Cee'd should accelerate faster than 1983 Mini MK V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Kia Cee'd weights approximately 733 kg more than 1983 Mini MK V. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Kia Cee'd (255 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 185 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Mini MK V. (70 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2012 Kia Cee'd will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Mini MK V.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Mini MK V | 2012 Kia Cee'd | |
Make | Mini | Kia |
Model | MK V | Cee'd |
Year Released | 1983 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 997 cc | 1582 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 70 Nm | 255 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 1900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 625 kg | 1358 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2660 mm |