1983 Nissan Bluebird vs. 1966 Triumph Vitesse
To start off, 1983 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph Vitesse. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph Vitesse would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Triumph Vitesse is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Triumph Vitesse (89 HP) has 32 more horse power than 1983 Nissan Bluebird. (57 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Triumph Vitesse should accelerate faster than 1983 Nissan Bluebird.
Because 1966 Triumph Vitesse is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Triumph Vitesse. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Nissan Bluebird, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Nissan Bluebird | 1966 Triumph Vitesse | |
Make | Nissan | Triumph |
Model | Bluebird | Vitesse |
Year Released | 1983 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1950 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 57 HP | 89 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1530 mm |