1983 Nissan Bluebird vs. 1976 NSU Ro 80
To start off, 1983 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 NSU Ro 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 NSU Ro 80 would be higher. At 2,390 cc, 1976 NSU Ro 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 NSU Ro 80 (114 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1983 Nissan Bluebird. (104 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1976 NSU Ro 80 should accelerate faster than 1983 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 NSU Ro 80 weights approximately 40 kg more than 1983 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 162 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Nissan Bluebird | 1976 NSU Ro 80 | |
| Make | Nissan | NSU |
| Model | Bluebird | Ro 80 |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1973 cc | 2390 cc |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 114 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 162 Nm | 162 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2860 mm |
