1983 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2011 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2011 Ford Ranger is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford Ranger (207 HP) has 126 more horse power than 1983 Nissan Bluebird. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1983 Nissan Bluebird.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford Ranger (322 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 201 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Nissan Bluebird. (121 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2011 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Nissan Bluebird | 2011 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Nissan | Ford |
Model | Bluebird | Ranger |
Year Released | 1983 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1593 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 207 HP |
Torque | 121 Nm | 322 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 5171 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1763 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 3193 mm |