1983 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2012 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2012 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 2,953 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda BT-50 (154 HP) has 73 more horse power than 1983 Nissan Bluebird. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1983 Nissan Bluebird.
Because 2012 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Nissan Bluebird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mazda BT-50 (380 Nm @ 180 RPM) has 259 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Nissan Bluebird. (121 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2012 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Nissan Bluebird | 2012 Mazda BT-50 | |
Make | Nissan | Mazda |
Model | Bluebird | BT-50 |
Year Released | 1983 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1593 cc | 2953 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 154 HP |
Torque | 121 Nm | 380 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 180 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 3010 mm |