1983 Nissan Pulsar vs. 1979 Honda Prelude
To start off, 1983 Nissan Pulsar is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Honda Prelude. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Honda Prelude would be higher. At 1,602 cc (4 cylinders), 1979 Honda Prelude is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Honda Prelude weights approximately 55 kg more than 1983 Nissan Pulsar.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1979 Honda Prelude has automatic transmission and 1983 Nissan Pulsar has manual transmission. 1983 Nissan Pulsar will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1979 Honda Prelude will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Nissan Pulsar | 1979 Honda Prelude | |
Make | Nissan | Honda |
Model | Pulsar | Prelude |
Year Released | 1983 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1270 cc | 1602 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 865 kg | 920 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2330 mm |