1983 Nissan Pulsar vs. 2006 Suzuki Aerio
To start off, 2006 Suzuki Aerio is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 2,294 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Suzuki Aerio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Suzuki Aerio (155 HP) has 85 more horse power than 1983 Nissan Pulsar. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Suzuki Aerio should accelerate faster than 1983 Nissan Pulsar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Suzuki Aerio weights approximately 185 kg more than 1983 Nissan Pulsar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Suzuki Aerio (206 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 91 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Nissan Pulsar. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2006 Suzuki Aerio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Nissan Pulsar.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Nissan Pulsar | 2006 Suzuki Aerio | |
Make | Nissan | Suzuki |
Model | Pulsar | Aerio |
Year Released | 1983 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1486 cc | 2294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 155 HP |
Torque | 115 Nm | 206 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 880 kg | 1065 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4240 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2490 mm |