1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 1961 Triumph TR3
To start off, 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Triumph TR3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Triumph TR3 would be higher. At 2,259 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 416 kg more than 1961 Triumph TR3.
Because 1961 Triumph TR3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Triumph TR3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 1961 Triumph TR3 | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Triumph |
Model | Cutlass | TR3 |
Year Released | 1983 | 1961 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2259 cc | 2138 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 101 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 904 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 3840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2240 mm |