1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 1975 Volvo 260
To start off, 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Volvo 260. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Volvo 260 would be higher. At 2,664 cc (6 cylinders), 1975 Volvo 260 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Volvo 260 weights approximately 30 kg more than 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 1975 Volvo 260 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Volvo 260. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 1975 Volvo 260 | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Volvo |
Model | Cutlass | 260 |
Year Released | 1983 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2259 cc | 2664 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 146 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2660 mm |