1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 1980 Suzuki Cervo
To start off, 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Suzuki Cervo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Suzuki Cervo would be higher. At 2,259 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 785 kg more than 1980 Suzuki Cervo.
Because 1980 Suzuki Cervo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Suzuki Cervo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 1980 Suzuki Cervo | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Suzuki |
| Model | Cutlass | Cervo |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2259 cc | 539 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 26 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 535 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 3200 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2040 mm |
