1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2002 Kia Visto
To start off, 2002 Kia Visto is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,259 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 520 kg more than 2002 Kia Visto.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2002 Kia Visto | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Kia |
| Model | Cutlass | Visto |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2259 cc | 796 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 53 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 800 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2390 mm |
