1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 620 kg more than 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Jeep |
Model | Cutlass | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1983 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2259 cc | 4701 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 266 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2700 mm |