1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2004 Rolls-Royce 100
To start off, 2004 Rolls-Royce 100 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 8,998 cc (16 cylinders), 2004 Rolls-Royce 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Rolls-Royce 100 weights approximately 1320 kg more than 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2004 Rolls-Royce 100 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Rolls-Royce 100. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2004 Rolls-Royce 100 | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Cutlass | 100 |
Year Released | 1983 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2259 cc | 8998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 16 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 2640 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 5680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 2000 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3480 mm |