1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2005 Chevrolet Cavalier
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Cavalier is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,259 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 133 kg more than 2005 Chevrolet Cavalier.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2005 Chevrolet Cavalier | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Chevrolet |
| Model | Cutlass | Cavalier |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2259 cc | 2190 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 120 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1187 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4600 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2810 mm |
