1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2005 Renault Grand Espace
To start off, 2005 Renault Grand Espace is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,945 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Renault Grand Espace is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Grand Espace weights approximately 640 kg more than 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2005 Renault Grand Espace | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Renault |
| Model | Cutlass | Grand Espace |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2259 cc | 2945 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 175 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4870 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1900 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2630 mm |
