1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 780 kg more than 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Jeep |
| Model | Cutlass | Grand Cherokee |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2259 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 210 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 2100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4775 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1844 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2781 mm |
