1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2010 Suzuki Kizashi
To start off, 2010 Suzuki Kizashi is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Suzuki Kizashi is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Suzuki Kizashi weights approximately 150 kg more than 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2010 Suzuki Kizashi is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Suzuki Kizashi will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2010 Suzuki Kizashi | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Suzuki |
Model | Cutlass | Kizashi |
Year Released | 1983 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2259 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 185 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4651 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1821 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2700 mm |