1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2011 Mazda 3
To start off, 2011 Mazda 3 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,259 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2011 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Mazda |
Model | Cutlass | 3 |
Year Released | 1983 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2259 cc | 2184 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1755 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2639 mm |