1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2012 BMW Z4
To start off, 2012 BMW Z4 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 BMW Z4 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 BMW Z4 weights approximately 155 kg more than 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2012 BMW Z4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 BMW Z4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2012 BMW Z4 | |
Make | Oldsmobile | BMW |
Model | Cutlass | Z4 |
Year Released | 1983 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2259 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 255 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1475 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4239 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1791 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2497 mm |