1983 Opel Ascona vs. 1952 Triumph Mayflower
To start off, 1983 Opel Ascona is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Triumph Mayflower. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Triumph Mayflower would be higher. At 1,297 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Opel Ascona is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Opel Ascona (74 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1952 Triumph Mayflower. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Opel Ascona should accelerate faster than 1952 Triumph Mayflower. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Triumph Mayflower weights approximately 30 kg more than 1983 Opel Ascona.
Let's talk about torque, 1983 Opel Ascona (101 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Triumph Mayflower. (79 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 1983 Opel Ascona will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Triumph Mayflower.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Opel Ascona | 1952 Triumph Mayflower | |
Make | Opel | Triumph |
Model | Ascona | Mayflower |
Year Released | 1983 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1297 cc | 1247 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 37 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 101 Nm | 79 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 6.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2140 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 45 L |