1983 Opel Ascona vs. 2003 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2003 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Opel Ascona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Opel Ascona would be higher. At 2,184 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Nissan X-Trail (112 HP @ 2000 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1983 Opel Ascona. (74 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1983 Opel Ascona. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 680 kg more than 1983 Opel Ascona. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Nissan X-Trail (270 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 169 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Opel Ascona. (101 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2003 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Opel Ascona.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Opel Ascona | 2003 Nissan X-Trail | |
| Make | Opel | Nissan |
| Model | Ascona | X-Trail |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1297 cc | 2184 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 112 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Torque | 101 Nm | 270 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 73.4 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 16.0:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 1600 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2540 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 60 L |
