1983 Opel Ascona vs. 2005 Renault Clio
To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Opel Ascona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Opel Ascona would be higher. At 1,461 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Renault Clio (81 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1983 Opel Ascona. (74 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1983 Opel Ascona. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Clio weights approximately 115 kg more than 1983 Opel Ascona. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Renault Clio (185 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Opel Ascona. (101 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2005 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Opel Ascona.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Opel Ascona | 2005 Renault Clio | |
Make | Opel | Renault |
Model | Ascona | Clio |
Year Released | 1983 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1297 cc | 1461 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 101 Nm | 185 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 73.4 mm | 80.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 18.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 1035 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 48 L |