1983 Opel Ascona vs. 2006 Renault Clio
To start off, 2006 Renault Clio is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Opel Ascona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Opel Ascona would be higher. At 1,461 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Opel Ascona (74 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2006 Renault Clio. (67 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Opel Ascona should accelerate faster than 2006 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Renault Clio weights approximately 310 kg more than 1983 Opel Ascona.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Renault Clio (160 Nm @ 1700 RPM) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Opel Ascona. (101 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2006 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Opel Ascona.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Opel Ascona | 2006 Renault Clio | |
Make | Opel | Renault |
Model | Ascona | Clio |
Year Released | 1983 | 2006 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1297 cc | 1461 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 101 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 1700 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 73.4 mm | 80.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 18.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 1230 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 55 L |