1983 Opel Manta vs. 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Opel Manta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Opel Manta would be higher. At 3,956 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 838 kg more than 1983 Opel Manta.
Because 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Opel Manta. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Opel Manta | 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Opel | Jeep |
Model | Manta | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1983 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1297 cc | 3956 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 188 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 996 kg | 1834 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2770 mm |