1983 Peugeot 205 vs. 1979 Volvo 66
To start off, 1983 Peugeot 205 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 1,289 cc (4 cylinders), 1979 Volvo 66 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Volvo 66 (56 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1983 Peugeot 205. (50 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1979 Volvo 66 should accelerate faster than 1983 Peugeot 205.
Because 1979 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Peugeot 205, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1979 Volvo 66 (94 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Peugeot 205. (84 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 1979 Volvo 66 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Peugeot 205. 1979 Volvo 66 has automatic transmission and 1983 Peugeot 205 has manual transmission. 1983 Peugeot 205 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1979 Volvo 66 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Peugeot 205 | 1979 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Peugeot | Volvo |
Model | 205 | 66 |
Year Released | 1983 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1124 cc | 1289 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 50 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 84 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 69 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 8.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1550 mm |