1983 Peugeot 205 vs. 2002 Renault Clio
To start off, 2002 Renault Clio is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Peugeot 205. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Peugeot 205 would be higher. At 2,946 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Renault Clio (252 HP) has 172 more horse power than 1983 Peugeot 205. (80 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1983 Peugeot 205. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Renault Clio weights approximately 600 kg more than 1983 Peugeot 205. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Renault Clio is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Renault Clio. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Peugeot 205, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Renault Clio (300 Nm @ 4650 RPM) has 191 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Peugeot 205. (109 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2002 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Peugeot 205.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Peugeot 205 | 2002 Renault Clio | |
Make | Peugeot | Renault |
Model | 205 | Clio |
Year Released | 1983 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1360 cc | 2946 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 80 HP | 252 HP |
Torque | 109 Nm | 300 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4650 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 75.1 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 77 mm | 82.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 11.4:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 3850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2480 mm |