1983 Peugeot 305 vs. 2012 SsangYong Rodius
To start off, 2012 SsangYong Rodius is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Peugeot 305. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Peugeot 305 would be higher. At 2,696 cc (5 cylinders), 2012 SsangYong Rodius is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 SsangYong Rodius (163 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 1983 Peugeot 305. (65 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 SsangYong Rodius should accelerate faster than 1983 Peugeot 305. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 SsangYong Rodius weights approximately 938 kg more than 1983 Peugeot 305. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 SsangYong Rodius is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 SsangYong Rodius. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Peugeot 305, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 SsangYong Rodius (342 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 220 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Peugeot 305. (122 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2012 SsangYong Rodius will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Peugeot 305.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Peugeot 305 | 2012 SsangYong Rodius | |
Make | Peugeot | SsangYong |
Model | 305 | Rodius |
Year Released | 1983 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1905 cc | 2696 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 65 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 122 Nm | 342 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 86.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 92.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 23.5:1 | 18.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 985 kg | 1923 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1920 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 3010 mm |