1983 Plymouth Caravelle vs. 2010 Renault Symbol
To start off, 2010 Renault Symbol is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Plymouth Caravelle. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Plymouth Caravelle would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Plymouth Caravelle is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Renault Symbol (104 HP) has 8 more horse power than 1983 Plymouth Caravelle. (96 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Renault Symbol should accelerate faster than 1983 Plymouth Caravelle. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Plymouth Caravelle weights approximately 165 kg more than 2010 Renault Symbol.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Plymouth Caravelle (158 Nm) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Renault Symbol. (148 Nm). This means 1983 Plymouth Caravelle will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Renault Symbol.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Plymouth Caravelle | 2010 Renault Symbol | |
| Make | Plymouth | Renault |
| Model | Caravelle | Symbol |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 104 HP |
| Torque | 158 Nm | 148 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 1000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4261 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1639 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1439 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2473 mm |
