1983 Plymouth Voyager vs. 1996 Renault Clio
To start off, 1996 Renault Clio is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Plymouth Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Plymouth Voyager would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Renault Clio weights approximately 300 kg more than 1983 Plymouth Voyager.
Because 1996 Renault Clio is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Renault Clio. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Plymouth Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Plymouth Voyager | 1996 Renault Clio | |
Make | Plymouth | Renault |
Model | Voyager | Clio |
Year Released | 1983 | 1996 |
Body Type | Minivan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 250 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 1650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2490 mm |