1983 Pontiac Firebird vs. 1966 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 1983 Pontiac Firebird is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 2,827 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Pontiac Firebird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Pontiac Firebird (134 HP) has 99 more horse power than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. (35 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Pontiac Firebird should accelerate faster than 1966 Suzuki Fronte.
Because 1983 Pontiac Firebird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Pontiac Firebird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Suzuki Fronte, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Pontiac Firebird (223 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. (81 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1983 Pontiac Firebird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Pontiac Firebird | 1966 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Pontiac | Suzuki |
| Model | Firebird | Fronte |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1966 |
| Engine Size | 2827 cc | 785 cc |
| Horse Power | 134 HP | 35 HP |
| Torque | 223 Nm | 81 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2250 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 66 L |
