1983 Renault 18 vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Renault 18. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Renault 18 would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford E-350 (177 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 1983 Renault 18. (63 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1983 Renault 18.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford E-350 (184 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Renault 18. (103 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Renault 18.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Renault 18 | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Renault | Ford |
Model | 18 | E-350 |
Year Released | 1983 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1397 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 103 Nm | 184 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2619 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 57 L |