1983 Renault 4 vs. 2012 Ford Bantam
To start off, 2012 Ford Bantam is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Renault 4 would be higher. At 1,296 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Ford Bantam is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford Bantam (74 HP) has 40 more horse power than 1983 Renault 4. (34 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford Bantam should accelerate faster than 1983 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford Bantam weights approximately 271 kg more than 1983 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford Bantam (110 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Renault 4. (62 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2012 Ford Bantam will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Renault 4.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Renault 4 | 2012 Ford Bantam | |
Make | Renault | Ford |
Model | 4 | Bantam |
Year Released | 1983 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 956 cc | 1296 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 62 Nm | 110 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 695 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1470 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2670 mm |