1983 Renault Siete vs. 2010 Ferrari California

To start off, 2010 Ferrari California is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Renault Siete. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Renault Siete would be higher. At 4,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Ferrari California is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ferrari California (460 HP) has 416 more horse power than 1983 Renault Siete. (44 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ferrari California should accelerate faster than 1983 Renault Siete. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ferrari California weights approximately 920 kg more than 1983 Renault Siete. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2010 Ferrari California is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Ferrari California. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Renault Siete, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ferrari California (483 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 399 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Renault Siete. (84 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2010 Ferrari California will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Renault Siete.

Compare all specifications: