1983 Renault Siete vs. 2010 Toyota 4Runner

To start off, 2010 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Renault Siete. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Renault Siete would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Toyota 4Runner (270 HP) has 226 more horse power than 1983 Renault Siete. (44 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1983 Renault Siete. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 1340 kg more than 1983 Renault Siete. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2010 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Renault Siete. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Toyota 4Runner (376 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 292 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Renault Siete. (84 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2010 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Renault Siete. 2010 Toyota 4Runner has automatic transmission and 1983 Renault Siete has manual transmission. 1983 Renault Siete will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Toyota 4Runner will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: