1983 Skoda L vs. 2002 Acura CL
To start off, 2002 Acura CL is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Skoda L. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Skoda L would be higher. At 3,210 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Acura CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Acura CL (260 HP @ 6900 RPM) has 216 more horse power than 1983 Skoda L. (44 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Acura CL should accelerate faster than 1983 Skoda L. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Acura CL weights approximately 755 kg more than 1983 Skoda L. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Acura CL (315 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 241 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Skoda L. (74 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2002 Acura CL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Skoda L.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Skoda L | 2002 Acura CL | |
Make | Skoda | Acura |
Model | L | CL |
Year Released | 1983 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1046 cc | 3210 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 260 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6900 RPM |
Torque | 74 Nm | 315 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 9.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 825 kg | 1580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 65 L |