1983 Skoda L vs. 2009 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2009 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Skoda L. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Skoda L would be higher. At 1,124 cc (3 cylinders), 2009 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mitsubishi Colt (54 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1983 Skoda L. (44 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 1983 Skoda L. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 625 kg more than 1983 Skoda L. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mitsubishi Colt (100 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Skoda L. (74 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Skoda L.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Skoda L | 2009 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Skoda | Mitsubishi |
Model | L | Colt |
Year Released | 1983 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1046 cc | 1124 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 54 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 74 Nm | 100 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 825 kg | 1450 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 3640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1695 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 47 L |