1983 Skoda L vs. 2010 Suzuki Equator
To start off, 2010 Suzuki Equator is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Skoda L. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Skoda L would be higher. At 2,501 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Suzuki Equator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Suzuki Equator (150 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1983 Skoda L. (44 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Suzuki Equator should accelerate faster than 1983 Skoda L. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Suzuki Equator weights approximately 150 kg more than 1983 Skoda L. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Suzuki Equator (171 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Skoda L. (74 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Suzuki Equator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Skoda L.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Skoda L | 2010 Suzuki Equator | |
| Make | Skoda | Suzuki |
| Model | L | Equator |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1046 cc | 2501 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 44 HP | 150 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 74 Nm | 171 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 825 kg | 975 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 5250 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3200 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 80 L |
