1983 Skoda Rapid R vs. 1995 Ford Windstar

To start off, 1995 Ford Windstar is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Skoda Rapid R. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Skoda Rapid R would be higher. At 3,797 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Ford Windstar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Ford Windstar (155 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1983 Skoda Rapid R. (62 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Ford Windstar should accelerate faster than 1983 Skoda Rapid R. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Ford Windstar weights approximately 840 kg more than 1983 Skoda Rapid R. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1983 Skoda Rapid R is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Skoda Rapid R. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Ford Windstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Ford Windstar (220 Nm) has 121 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Skoda Rapid R. (99 Nm). This means 1995 Ford Windstar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Skoda Rapid R.

Compare all specifications: