1983 Subaru Coupe vs. 2012 SsangYong Stavic
To start off, 2012 SsangYong Stavic is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Subaru Coupe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Subaru Coupe would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 SsangYong Stavic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 SsangYong Stavic (217 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 150 more horse power than 1983 Subaru Coupe. (67 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 SsangYong Stavic should accelerate faster than 1983 Subaru Coupe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 SsangYong Stavic weights approximately 1119 kg more than 1983 Subaru Coupe. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 SsangYong Stavic is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Subaru Coupe. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 SsangYong Stavic will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 SsangYong Stavic (312 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 198 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Subaru Coupe. (114 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2012 SsangYong Stavic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Subaru Coupe. 2012 SsangYong Stavic has automatic transmission and 1983 Subaru Coupe has manual transmission. 1983 Subaru Coupe will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 SsangYong Stavic will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Subaru Coupe | 2012 SsangYong Stavic | |
Make | Subaru | SsangYong |
Model | Coupe | Stavic |
Year Released | 1983 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1595 cc | 3199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 114 Nm | 312 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 91.9 mm | 89.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 60 mm | 84 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 915 kg | 2034 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1920 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 3010 mm |