1983 Suzuki Alto vs. 2010 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2010 Jeep Compass is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Suzuki Alto. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Suzuki Alto would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jeep Compass (158 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 1983 Suzuki Alto. (39 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 1983 Suzuki Alto.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jeep Compass (191 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 132 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Suzuki Alto. (59 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Jeep Compass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Suzuki Alto.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Suzuki Alto | 2010 Jeep Compass | |
| Make | Suzuki | Jeep |
| Model | Alto | Compass |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 796 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 39 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 59 Nm | 191 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3300 mm | 4404 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1656 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2160 mm | 2634 mm |
