1983 Suzuki Fronte vs. 2004 Westfield XTR 2
To start off, 2004 Westfield XTR 2 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 1,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Westfield XTR 2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Westfield XTR 2 (173 HP @ 9800 RPM) has 144 more horse power than 1983 Suzuki Fronte. (29 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Westfield XTR 2 should accelerate faster than 1983 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Suzuki Fronte weights approximately 111 kg more than 2004 Westfield XTR 2.
Because 2004 Westfield XTR 2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Westfield XTR 2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Suzuki Fronte, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Suzuki Fronte | 2004 Westfield XTR 2 | |
| Make | Suzuki | Westfield |
| Model | Fronte | XTR 2 |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2004 |
| Engine Size | 543 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 29 HP | 173 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 9800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 555 kg | 444 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 3690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2160 mm | 2320 mm |
